advertisement: work in movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.64
, campaign
Weight: 0.61
, web page
Weight: 0.61
Siblings billboard
Weight: 0.61
, commercial
Weight: 0.61
, catalogue
Weight: 0.48
, ad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in movies 1.00
be in movies 0.96
is film 0.83
look like movie trailers 0.81
work in tv 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(billboard, is film)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(billboard, is film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(billboard, is film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(advertisement, work in movies)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(advertisement, be in movies)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be in movies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be in movies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(advertisement, be in movies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(advertisement, work in tv)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(advertisement, work in tv)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(advertisement, work in movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(billboard, is film)