advertisement: work in tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.64
, campaign
Weight: 0.61
, web page
Weight: 0.61
Siblings billboard
Weight: 0.61
, commercial
Weight: 0.61
, catalogue
Weight: 0.48
, ad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in tv 1.00
be on tv 0.96
be added to tv 0.90
have radio shitty tv 0.89
have radio tv 0.89
be on tv loud 0.86
be on tv selected 0.85
shown during tv show 0.84
be on television 0.81
be louder than tv programming 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be on tv)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be added to tv)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(commercial, shown during tv show)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be on tv selected)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than tv programming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(commercial, shown during tv show)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(commercial, shown during tv show)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(commercial, be on tv)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(commercial, be on tv)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(commercial, be added to tv)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(commercial, be added to tv)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than tv programming)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(commercial, be on tv loud)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(commercial, be on tv selected)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(commercial, be on tv selected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(advertisement, work in tv)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, be on television)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(advertisement, be on television)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(advertisement, be on television)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(advertisement, be on television)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(advertisement, work in tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(commercial, be on tv)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(commercial, be added to tv)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(commercial, shown during tv show)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(commercial, be on tv selected)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, work in tv)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than tv programming)