advertising: be bad days

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , business activity Weight: 0.62 , investment Weight: 0.60 , content Weight: 0.59
Siblings	advertising agency Weight: 0.71 , revenue Weight: 0.34 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad days	1.00
be rare days	0.81
has quality bad	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(content, be rare days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(advertising, be bad days)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(advertising, be bad days)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(advertising, be bad days)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(content, be rare days)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(content, be rare days)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(content, be rare days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(advertising, be bad days)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(advertising, be bad days)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(investment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(advertising, be bad days)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(advertising, be bad days)

Similarity expansion

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(advertising, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(advertising, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(advertising, be bad days)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(content, be rare days)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(advertising, be bad days) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(content, be rare days)