advertising: be for food service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for food service 1.00
provide internet service 0.84
be for restaurants 0.75
hydrogenate food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(industry, hydrogenate food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(advertising, be for food service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(industry, hydrogenate food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(industry, hydrogenate food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet service provider, provide internet service)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(industry, hydrogenate food)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(advertising, be for food service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(internet service provider, provide internet service)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(internet service provider, provide internet service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(advertising, be for food service)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for restaurants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(advertising, be for restaurants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(advertising, be for restaurants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(advertising, be for restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(advertising, be for food service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(industry, hydrogenate food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(internet service provider, provide internet service)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(advertising, be for food service)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(industry, hydrogenate food)