advertising: be for restaurants

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , business activity Weight: 0.62 , investment Weight: 0.60 , content Weight: 0.59
Siblings	advertising agency Weight: 0.71 , revenue Weight: 0.34 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be for restaurants	1.00
be for food service	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(advertising, be for restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for food service)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(advertising, be for food service)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(advertising, be for food service)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(advertising, be for food service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Salient(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(advertising, be for restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(advertising, be for restaurants)