advertising: compare to advertising online

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to advertising online 1.00
be critical to advertising targeting 0.79
varies from advertising 0.78
varies from american advertising 0.77
be important in social media marketing 0.77
be important in media marketing 0.77
be important to marketers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(content, be important in social media marketing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(content, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(content, be critical to advertising targeting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(content, be critical to advertising targeting)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(content, be important to marketers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(content, be important in social media marketing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(content, be critical to advertising targeting)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(content, be important in social media marketing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(content, be important to marketers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(content, be important in social media marketing)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(content, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(content, be critical to advertising targeting)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(advertising, compare to advertising online)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(advertising, varies from american advertising)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(advertising, varies from american advertising)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(advertising, varies from american advertising)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(advertising, varies from american advertising)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(content, be critical to advertising targeting)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(content, be important to marketers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(content, be important in social media marketing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(content, be critical to advertising targeting)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(content, be important to marketers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(advertising, compare to advertising online)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(content, be important in social media marketing)