advertising: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality standard 0.83
has quality cost 0.82
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
has quality asset 0.76
has quality virtue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(investment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(investment, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality virtue)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is good thing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(investment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(industry, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(investment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(investment, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(revenue, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(advertising, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(advertising, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(advertising, has quality cost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality cost)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(advertising, has quality cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(advertising, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(revenue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(investment, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(investment, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(investment, is good thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(advertising, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(industry, has quality virtue)