advertising: has state agencies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state agencies 1.00
has state agency 0.87
be to government 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(investment, be to government)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(advertising, has state agencies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(investment, be to government)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(investment, be to government)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(investment, be to government)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(advertising, has state agencies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(advertising, has state agencies)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(advertising, has state agency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(advertising, has state agency)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(advertising, has state agency)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has state agency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has state agencies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(advertising, has state agencies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(investment, be to government)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(advertising, has state agencies)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(investment, be to government)