advertising: is interesting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interesting 1.00
be important 40 0.78
is just important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(investment, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(advertising, is interesting)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(advertising, is interesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(investment, is interesting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(investment, is interesting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(investment, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(advertising, is interesting)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(industry, be important 40)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(advertising, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(advertising, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(advertising, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(investment, is interesting)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(investment, is interesting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(advertising, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)