advertising: remain viable business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
, investment
Weight: 0.60
, content
Weight: 0.59
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.71
, revenue
Weight: 0.34
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
remain viable business 1.00
remain business 0.90
is profitable 0.80
be important for business 0.80
be profitable 0.80
be important in business 0.80
be important to business 0.79
be for business 0.79
be profitable for companies 0.79
be business 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(investment, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(advertising, remain viable business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(investment, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(advertising, remain viable business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(investment, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(investment, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(investment, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(advertising, remain viable business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(investment, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(advertising, remain viable business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(revenue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(advertising, remain viable business)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(advertising, remain business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(advertising, remain business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(advertising, remain business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(advertising, be business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(advertising, be important to business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(advertising, be for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(advertising, be business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(advertising, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(advertising, be for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(advertising, be profitable for companies)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be profitable for companies)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(advertising, be business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be important to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(advertising, be profitable for companies)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(advertising, be important to business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(advertising, be for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(advertising, be profitable for companies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(advertising, remain viable business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(investment, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(revenue, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(advertising, remain viable business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(investment, be important for business)