aero: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, feature
Weight: 0.47
, item
Weight: 0.47
, application
Weight: 0.46
Siblings aviation
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, engineering
Weight: 0.31
, auto racing
Weight: 0.31
, spare tire
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(engineering, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(engineering, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(engineering, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(aero, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aero, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(aero, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(aero, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aero, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aero, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aero, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aero, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(engineering, has quality bad)