aerosol can: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents can
Weight: 0.68
, container
Weight: 0.65
, product
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, explosive
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aerosol
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, food can
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, hair spray
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for game 0.78
be important to earth 's climate 0.78
cool climate 0.77
is good thing 0.77
has quality good 0.77
be important for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(can, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(product, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(explosive, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(explosive, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(can, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(explosive, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(explosive, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(can, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(product, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(can, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(explosive, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(explosive, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(can, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(explosive, is good thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(product, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food can, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, cool climate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(can, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(product, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(explosive, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(explosive, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(food can, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(food can, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(aerosol, cool climate)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(aerosol, cool climate)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(explosive, is good thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(can, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(can, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(food can, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(aerosol, cool climate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(aerosol, be important to earth 's climate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(can, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(explosive, is good thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(can, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)