aerosol can: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents can
Weight: 0.68
, container
Weight: 0.65
, product
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, explosive
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aerosol
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, food can
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, hair spray
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality availability 0.78
is good thing 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(can, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(can, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(explosive, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(explosive, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(explosive, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(can, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(explosive, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(can, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(explosive, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(explosive, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(can, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(can, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(explosive, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food can, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(can, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(can, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(explosive, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(explosive, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(food can, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(food can, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aerosol can, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(explosive, is good thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(can, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(can, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(food can, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(can, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(explosive, is good thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(aerosol can, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(can, be bad for environment)