aerosol: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.60
, particle
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hair spray
Weight: 0.67
, dust
Weight: 0.65
, aerosol can
Weight: 0.37
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.35
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dust, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dust, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aerosol can, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aerosol can, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol can, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(aerosol, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aerosol, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(aerosol, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aerosol can, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aerosol can, be bad for environment)