african american: were treated in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents african
Weight: 0.81
, american
Weight: 0.73
, asian
Weight: 0.69
, new york city
Weight: 0.68
Siblings frederick douglass
Weight: 0.70
, german
Weight: 0.55
, native american
Weight: 0.41
, george washington
Weight: 0.39
, south america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in past 1.00
were treated in 1866 0.92
were treated in 1920s 0.92
were treated 0.91
were treated bad 0.89
were treated during period 0.88
were treated at home 0.88
were treated in south 0.88
were treated during war 0.87
were in north treated 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(native american, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in past)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(african american, were treated)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(african american, were treated)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(african american, were treated at home)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(african american, were treated at home)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(african american, were treated in south)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in south)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated at home)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in south)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated at home)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1920s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in south)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1866)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(native american, were treated)