age: is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents population
Weight: 0.60
, limit
Weight: 0.60
, cause
Weight: 0.59
, form
Weight: 0.59
Siblings golden age
Weight: 0.73
, ten
Weight: 0.47
, thirty
Weight: 0.40
, old english
Weight: 0.31
, size
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia 1.00
is memory impairment mistaken for dementia 1.00
is related memory impairment mistaken 0.96
is memory impairment mistaken 0.96
is related memory mistaken for dementia 0.94
is memory mistaken for dementia 0.92
is related memory mistaken 0.84
is related memory 0.81
be linked to presbycusis 0.80
is memory mistaken 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(age, is related memory mistaken for dementia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(age, is related memory mistaken for dementia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(age, is related memory mistaken for dementia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(age, be linked to presbycusis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(age, is related memory mistaken for dementia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(age, be linked to presbycusis)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(age, be linked to presbycusis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(age, be linked to presbycusis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(age, is related memory impairment mistaken for dementia)