agenda: set important in negotiation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.63
, forum
Weight: 0.34
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.33
, manifesto
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
set important in negotiation 1.00
set important in cbt 0.79
set important in 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in negotiation)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in negotiation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(agenda, set important in negotiation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in negotiation)