agenda: set theory important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.63
, forum
Weight: 0.34
, political ideology
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.33
, manifesto
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
set theory important 1.00
is theory 0.90
set important in cbt 0.84
set important in 0.84
be related to bang theory 0.82
is accepted theory 0.82
affect bang theory 0.82
be related to big bang theory 0.82
affect big bang theory 0.81
set important in policy cycle 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(agenda, set theory important)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in cbt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(agenda, set important in policy cycle)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(agenda, set important in policy cycle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(agenda, set theory important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(agenda, set theory important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(agenda, set theory important)