agent: be in hollywood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hollywood 1.00
is kevin mccarthy 0.78
is kevin cramer 0.76
is london 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(representative, is kevin mccarthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(representative, is kevin cramer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(representative, is kevin mccarthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(representative, is kevin mccarthy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, is kevin cramer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(representative, is kevin cramer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(agent, be in hollywood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(agent, be in hollywood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(agent, be in hollywood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(representative, is kevin mccarthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(agent, be in hollywood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(representative, is kevin cramer)