agent: charge fees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge fees 1.00
charge service fees 0.96
is fees 0.96
have fees 0.96
charge service fee 0.93
have high fees 0.92
charge cancellation fees 0.90
charge admin fees 0.89
get transfer fees 0.89
get high transfer fees 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, charge cancellation fees)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, charge service fee)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, charge fees)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, charge service fees)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, have fees)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is fees)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is fees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(travel agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(travel agent, charge fees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(solicitor, is fees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is fees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(attorney, is fees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(attorney, is fees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(travel agent, charge service fees)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(travel agent, charge service fees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(solicitor, have fees)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(solicitor, have fees)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(travel agent, charge service fee)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(travel agent, charge service fee)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solicitor, have high fees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(solicitor, have high fees)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel agent, charge cancellation fees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(travel agent, charge cancellation fees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(agent, charge fees)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge admin fees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(agent, get high transfer fees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agent, get transfer fees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(agent, charge admin fees)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(agent, get transfer fees)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(agent, get transfer fees)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(agent, charge admin fees)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(agent, get transfer fees)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(agent, get high transfer fees)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(agent, get high transfer fees)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(agent, charge admin fees)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(agent, get high transfer fees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(agent, charge fees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(solicitor, is fees)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(attorney, is fees)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(travel agent, charge fees)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(solicitor, have fees)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(travel agent, charge service fees)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(travel agent, charge service fee)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(solicitor, have high fees)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(agent, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(travel agent, charge cancellation fees)