agent: wear suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear suits 1.00
wear black 0.83
wear white wigs 0.83
wear 2 hats 0.81
wear wigs 0.81
wear sunglasses 0.81
wear wigs in court 0.81
wear hair 0.79
wear aprons 0.79
be in england wear wigs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, wear 2 hats)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(solicitor, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear black)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(attorney, wear hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear hair)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(travel agent, wear 2 hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(travel agent, wear 2 hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(agent, wear suits)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear aprons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(agent, wear sunglasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear aprons)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(agent, wear aprons)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(agent, wear aprons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(attorney, wear hair)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(travel agent, wear 2 hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear black)