agent: wear sunglasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biological agent
Weight: 0.76
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.65
, source
Weight: 0.64
, contractor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.75
, representative
Weight: 0.67
, beta blocker
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear sunglasses 1.00
wear 2 hats 0.83
wear white wigs 0.83
wear black 0.83
wear hair 0.83
wear wigs 0.82
wear suits 0.81
wear long hair 0.80
wear wigs in court 0.78
be in uk wear wigs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, wear 2 hats)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear hair)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear long hair)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs in court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, be in uk wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(attorney, wear hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear hair)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(solicitor, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear black)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(travel agent, wear 2 hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(travel agent, wear 2 hats)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(attorney, wear white wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(attorney, wear long hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear long hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(agent, wear sunglasses)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(agent, wear suits)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(agent, wear suits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs in court)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(attorney, be in uk wear wigs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(attorney, wear hair)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(travel agent, wear 2 hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(attorney, wear white wigs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(attorney, wear long hair)