aging: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is problem brainly 0.93
be different from problems 0.82
be research problem 0.82
be such problem in america 0.78
is issue 0.78
has state dislike 0.76
has state condition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aging, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aging, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aging, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aging, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(factor, has state dislike)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, is problem brainly)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(aging, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(aging, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(aging, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(aging, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(atherosclerosis, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, is problem brainly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(aging, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(aging, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(aging, is issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(aging, is issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(aging, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aging, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, is problem brainly)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aging, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)