agreement: be on e-waste difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accord
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, settlement
Weight: 0.63
, pact
Weight: 0.55
Siblings resolution
Weight: 0.68
, protocol
Weight: 0.68
, concession
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.66
, contract
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on e-waste difficult 1.00
was difficult in arabia 0.89
was on great plains difficult in 1800 0.81
was on great plains difficult 0.81
is hard 0.81
was on plains difficult in 1800 0.80
was on plains difficult 0.80
be on rohingya important 0.80
be important in counselling 0.78
is expensive right now 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(settlement, was on great plains difficult in 1800)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(settlement, was on plains difficult in 1800)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(settlement, was on great plains difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(settlement, was difficult in arabia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(settlement, was on plains difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pact, be on rohingya important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pact, be on rohingya important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(settlement, was difficult in arabia)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(settlement, was on plains difficult)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(settlement, was on great plains difficult)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(settlement, was on great plains difficult in 1800)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(settlement, was on plains difficult in 1800)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pact, be on rohingya important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(settlement, was difficult in arabia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(settlement, was on plains difficult in 1800)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(settlement, was on great plains difficult in 1800)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(settlement, was on great plains difficult)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(settlement, was on plains difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(resolution, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important in counselling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(settlement, was difficult in arabia)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(settlement, was on great plains difficult in 1800)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(settlement, was on great plains difficult)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(settlement, was on plains difficult in 1800)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(settlement, was on plains difficult)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pact, be on rohingya important)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(contract, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(contract, be important in counselling)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(resolution, is hard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(resolution, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(settlement, was difficult in arabia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pact, be on rohingya important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(settlement, was on plains difficult)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(settlement, was on great plains difficult)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(settlement, was on great plains difficult in 1800)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(settlement, was on plains difficult in 1800)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(resolution, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(contract, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(settlement, was difficult in arabia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pact, be on rohingya important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(settlement, was on plains difficult)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(settlement, was on great plains difficult)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(settlement, was on great plains difficult in 1800)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(agreement, be on e-waste difficult)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(settlement, was on plains difficult in 1800)