agreement: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accord
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, settlement
Weight: 0.63
, pact
Weight: 0.55
Siblings resolution
Weight: 0.68
, protocol
Weight: 0.68
, concession
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.66
, contract
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good fortnite 0.87
was good 0.84
affect quality 0.81
has quality price 0.80
be solid 0.76
be with great old one 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(accord, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pact, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(settlement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(solution, be solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pact, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pact, be with great old one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pact, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pact, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(accord, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(settlement, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pact, be with great old one)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(solution, be solid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(settlement, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(solution, be solid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(accord, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pact, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pact, be with great old one)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(concession, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grant, was good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, affect quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(accord, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pact, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(settlement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pact, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(solution, be solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pact, be with great old one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(concession, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(concession, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(resolution, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(resolution, affect quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(grant, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grant, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(resolution, is good fortnite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resolution, is good fortnite)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(agreement, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pact, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pact, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(accord, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pact, be with great old one)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(settlement, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(solution, be solid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(resolution, affect quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(concession, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, was good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(resolution, is good fortnite)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pact, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pact, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(accord, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(settlement, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pact, be with great old one)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(agreement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(solution, be solid)