agriculture: be considered art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, ministry
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.35
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, textile
Weight: 0.34
, education
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered art 1.00
be called art 0.93
is art 0.93
be considered science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(agriculture, be considered art)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(agriculture, is art)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(agriculture, be called art)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be called art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(agriculture, is art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be called art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(agriculture, be called art)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, is art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(agriculture, is art)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(agriculture, be considered science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)