agriculture: was important to ancient egyptians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, ministry
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.35
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, textile
Weight: 0.34
, education
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to ancient egyptians 1.00
was important in ancient egyptians 1.00
was important to egyptians 0.89
was important in egyptians 0.89
was important to humans 0.77
was necessary for development of civilization 0.77
be considered important to mankind 0.76
be considered very important to mankind 0.75
be important to humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important in ancient egyptians)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(agriculture, was important in ancient egyptians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(agriculture, was important in ancient egyptians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(agriculture, was important in ancient egyptians)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(agriculture, was necessary for development of civilization)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(agriculture, was necessary for development of civilization)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was necessary for development of civilization)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(agriculture, was necessary for development of civilization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, was important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to humans)