ai: is thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.52
, program
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, city
Weight: 0.45
, artist
Weight: 0.44
Siblings di
Weight: 0.31
, bing
Weight: 0.30
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, september
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thing 1.00
is good thing 0.95
is bad thing 0.94
is big thing 0.92
is next thing 0.87
is next big thing 0.85
is important now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bing, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bing, is thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bing, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ai, is thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ai, is good thing)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ai, is bad thing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ai, is big thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ai, is next thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ai, is next big thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ai, is next thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ai, is important now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ai, is next thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ai, is next thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ai, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ai, is good thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ai, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ai, is big thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ai, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ai, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ai, is next big thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ai, is important now)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(ai, is important now)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ai, is important now)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ai, is bad thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ai, is next big thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ai, is big thing)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ai, is next big thing)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ai, is big thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ai, is thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ai, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ai, is thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bing, is thing)