aid: be important in south africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wetsuit
Weight: 0.42
, sextant
Weight: 0.36
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.36
, grant
Weight: 0.32
, nuclear war
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in south africa 1.00
be high in south africa 0.96
be important in africa 0.95
be is treated in south africa 0.93
be prevalent in south africa 0.93
be in africa 0.92
be bad in africa 0.91
be related in africa 0.90
be high in africa 0.90
be bad for africa 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(aid, be important in south africa)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aid, be important in africa)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(aid, be is treated in south africa)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aid, be important in africa)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(aid, be in africa)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(aid, be bad in africa)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aid, be is treated in south africa)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(aid, be important in africa)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aid, be in africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aid, be bad for africa)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aid, be high in africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aid, be is treated in south africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(aid, be bad in africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(aid, be in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aid, be high in africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aid, be bad for africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(aid, be bad in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aid, be high in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aid, be bad for africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(aid, be is treated in south africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aid, be bad in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(aid, be important in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aid, be bad for africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aid, be in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aid, be high in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aid, be important in south africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aid, be important in south africa)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aid, be important in south africa)