air conditioner: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air
Weight: 0.74
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.72
, ventilation system
Weight: 0.71
, compressor
Weight: 0.69
Siblings hot air
Weight: 0.37
, air horn
Weight: 0.35
, fresh air
Weight: 0.35
, heater
Weight: 0.33
, heating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is less efficient 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioning, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(compressor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(compressor, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compressor, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heater, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioning, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(compressor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(heating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(heating, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(heater, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(air conditioner, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is expensive)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(air conditioner, is expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is less efficient)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(air conditioner, is less efficient)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(air conditioner, is less efficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is less efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(compressor, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(air conditioning, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heating, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heater, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(compressor, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(air conditioner, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(air conditioning, is expensive)