air pollution: be in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in city 1.00
be bad in city 0.92
benefit economy in city 0.80
be in mexico city considered 0.78
be bad in mexico city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(air pollution, be in city)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(air pollution, benefit economy in city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(air pollution, benefit economy in city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, benefit economy in city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in mexico city considered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(air pollution, benefit economy in city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in city)