air: be blasted into furnace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.59
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.74
, hot air
Weight: 0.73
, air horn
Weight: 0.62
, fresh air
Weight: 0.58
, brimstone
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be blasted into furnace 1.00
be blown into lime kiln 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be blasted into furnace)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be blown into lime kiln)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hot air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hot air, be blasted into furnace)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot air, be blown into lime kiln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hot air, be blown into lime kiln)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(air, be blasted into furnace)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air, be blown into lime kiln)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(air, be blown into lime kiln)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(air, be blown into lime kiln)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(air, be blown into lime kiln)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(air, be blasted into furnace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(air, be blasted into furnace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot air, be blasted into furnace)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(air, be blasted into furnace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hot air, be blown into lime kiln)