aircraft carrier: have angled flight decks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, warship
Weight: 0.70
, vessel
Weight: 0.67
, ship
Weight: 0.66
Siblings yorktown
Weight: 0.43
, cargo ship
Weight: 0.38
, helicopter
Weight: 0.36
, submarine
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have angled flight decks 1.00
have angled decks 0.95
is angled 0.88
have angled runways 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(aircraft carrier, have angled decks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(aircraft carrier, is angled)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled decks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled decks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(aircraft carrier, is angled)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled decks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(aircraft carrier, is angled)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled runways)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled runways)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aircraft carrier, have angled runways)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(aircraft carrier, is angled)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled runways)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(aircraft carrier, have angled flight decks)