alabama: be special

Related concepts

Parents	new hampshire Weight: 0.65 , country Weight: 0.64 , texas Weight: 0.63 , college Weight: 0.61
Siblings	georgia Weight: 0.64 , mississippi Weight: 0.60 , atlanta Weight: 0.59 , arkansas Weight: 0.55 , new mexico Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be special	1.00
is special	0.99
have special election	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(new hampshire, is special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(alabama, be special)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is special)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is special)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, have special election)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(new hampshire, is special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(alabama, be special)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(mississippi, have special election) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(mississippi, have special election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(alabama, be special)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(alabama, have special election)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(alabama, have special election)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(alabama, have special election)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(alabama, be special)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(alabama, be special)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(new hampshire, is special)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(mississippi, have special election)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(alabama, be special) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(new hampshire, is special)