alabama: have special election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have special election 1.00
have election 0.94
have 9 electoral votes 0.83
be special 0.79
is special 0.78
vote today 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new hampshire, is special)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alabama, have special election)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is special)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is special)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, have special election)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, have election)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new hampshire, is special)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(alabama, have special election)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(mississippi, have special election)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mississippi, have special election)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mississippi, have election)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mississippi, have election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(alabama, have special election)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(alabama, have 9 electoral votes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(alabama, have 9 electoral votes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(alabama, have 9 electoral votes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(alabama, be special)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(alabama, be special)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(alabama, be special)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have 9 electoral votes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be special)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alabama, have special election)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is special)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mississippi, have election)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mississippi, have special election)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(alabama, have special election)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is special)