alaska: be cold

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents puerto rico
Weight: 0.69
, canada
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.62
, north america
Weight: 0.59
, south america
Weight: 0.56
Siblings central america
Weight: 0.36
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.35
, south africa
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cold 1.00
be defined as cold state 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(canada, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alaska, be cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(canada, be cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(canada, be cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(canada, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(alaska, be cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(alaska, be cold)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(alaska, be defined as cold state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alaska, be defined as cold state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(alaska, be defined as cold state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be defined as cold state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alaska, be cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(canada, be cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(alaska, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(canada, be cold)