:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(canada, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alberta, is dry)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(canada, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(canada, is cold)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quebec, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(alaska, is cold)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(alberta, is dry)
Similarity expansion
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(alberta, is cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alberta, is cold)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is cold)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(alberta, is cold)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alberta, is dry)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(quebec, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alaska, is cold)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alberta, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canada, is cold)