alberta: was in debt in 1930

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents province
Weight: 0.65
, canada
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, location
Weight: 0.53
Siblings ontario
Weight: 0.37
, alaska
Weight: 0.35
, quebec
Weight: 0.35
, winnipeg
Weight: 0.34
, vancouver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in debt in 1930 1.00
was in debt 1.00
be in debt 0.98
was in big debt in 1930 0.96
was in big debt 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be in debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ontario, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ontario, be in debt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(alberta, was in debt in 1930)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(alberta, was in big debt in 1930)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(alberta, was in big debt in 1930)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(alberta, was in big debt in 1930)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(alberta, was in debt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(alberta, was in big debt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alberta, was in big debt in 1930)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(alberta, was in big debt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(alberta, be in debt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(alberta, be in debt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(alberta, was in big debt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(alberta, be in debt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(alberta, was in debt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(alberta, was in debt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(alberta, was in big debt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(alberta, was in debt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(alberta, be in debt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(alberta, was in debt in 1930)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alberta, was in debt in 1930) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ontario, be in debt)