algorithm: analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
analysis 1.00
be important in qualitative research 0.76
be used in qualitative research 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(regression, analysis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(regression, analysis)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(regression, analysis)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(algorithm, analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(algorithm, analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(regression, analysis)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, analysis)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)