algorithm: be connected effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected effect 1.00
be connected cause 0.86
be connected to world 0.81
be connected to real world 0.79
have impact 0.78
have impact on individuals 0.76
have positive impact on individuals 0.76
have positive impact 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(method, have impact)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(method, have positive impact)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(method, have impact)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(method, have positive impact)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(method, have positive impact on individuals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(method, have positive impact)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, have impact on individuals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(method, have impact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(method, have impact)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(method, have positive impact)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(algorithm, be connected effect)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected cause)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected to world)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected to real world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected cause)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected to world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(algorithm, be connected cause)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected cause)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected to world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(algorithm, be connected to world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(algorithm, be connected to real world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be connected to real world)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected to real world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(method, have impact)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact on individuals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(method, have impact)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, be connected effect)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact on individuals)