algorithm: be devised

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be devised 1.00
were invented 0.76
be created 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, were invented)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(algorithm, be devised)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, were invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer program, were invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, were invented)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be devised)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(algorithm, be devised)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(algorithm, be created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(algorithm, be created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be devised)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(algorithm, be devised)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, were invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(algorithm, be devised)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, were invented)