algorithm: be different from logorithm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from logorithm 1.00
was different from other people 0.91
was different from people 0.89
work in different countries 0.80
be same 0.77
differ around world 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(search engine, work in different countries)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, differ around world)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(method, was different from people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(concept, differ around world)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(search engine, work in different countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(concept, differ around world)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(search engine, work in different countries)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regression, be same)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(method, was different from people)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(search engine, work in different countries)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, differ around world)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(regression, be same)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(regression, be same)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(concept, differ around world)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(search engine, work in different countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(regression, be same)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(method, was different from people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(concept, differ around world)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(search engine, work in different countries)