algorithm: be important in computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in computer science 1.00
be used in computer programming 0.82
be important in computing 0.79
be important in research 0.78
be important for machine learning 0.77
be important in psychology 0.77
be in physics 0.77
be used for social engineering 0.76
be necessary in research 0.76
important for scientists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(method, important for scientists)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(concept, be in physics)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(search engine, be used for social engineering)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(search engine, be used for social engineering)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(concept, be in physics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in psychology)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(method, important for scientists)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(concept, be in physics)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(method, important for scientists)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(search engine, be used for social engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(method, important for scientists)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(concept, be in physics)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(search engine, be used for social engineering)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be important in research)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important for machine learning)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important for machine learning)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important for machine learning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important for machine learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(search engine, be used for social engineering)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(method, be important in psychology)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, important for scientists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(triangulation, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(search engine, be used for social engineering)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(method, be important in psychology)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, important for scientists)