algorithm: is technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is technology 1.00
software 0.76
be important in computing 0.76
be important in computer science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(algorithm, is technology)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, software)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, software)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(algorithm, software)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(algorithm, software)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, is technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(algorithm, is technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(algorithm, is technology)