algorithm: work in programming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, computer program
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings neural network
Weight: 0.75
, blowfish
Weight: 0.59
, regression
Weight: 0.57
, triangulation
Weight: 0.54
, hash table
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in programming 1.00
be important in programming 0.95
be used in programming 0.95
be important for programming 0.95
be used in computer programming 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(algorithm, work in programming)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(method, be used in programming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, be used in programming)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(method, be used in programming)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(algorithm, work in programming)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(algorithm, be used in computer programming)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important for programming)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in programming)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important for programming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(algorithm, work in programming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(algorithm, work in programming)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(method, be used in programming)