alice: be banned in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.57
, name
Weight: 0.56
, daughter
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elizabeth
Weight: 0.35
, mary
Weight: 0.35
, betty
Weight: 0.34
, annie
Weight: 0.34
, charles darwin
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in china 1.00
is banned 0.86
be banned in countries 0.82
be banned in saudi arabia 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(annie, is banned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(annie, is banned)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(annie, is banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(alice, be banned in china)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(alice, be banned in saudi arabia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(alice, be banned in saudi arabia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(alice, be banned in saudi arabia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alice, be banned in countries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(alice, be banned in saudi arabia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(alice, be banned in countries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alice, be banned in countries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(alice, be banned in countries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(alice, be banned in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(alice, be banned in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(alice, be banned in china)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(annie, is banned)