allergy: be bad in chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.61
, heart disease
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings asthma
Weight: 0.63
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.35
, lung cancer
Weight: 0.35
, acne
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in chicago 1.00
be bad in tennessee 0.85
be bad in kentucky 0.78
be from africa 0.76
be in las vegas 0.76
be in africa 0.76
start in africa 0.75
be worse in september 0.75
be related to huntington 's disease 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(heart disease, be related to huntington 's disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(disease, be from africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(disease, start in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(disease, start in africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(disease, be from africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(heart disease, be related to huntington 's disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(disease, start in africa)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(disease, be from africa)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, be related to huntington 's disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(heart disease, be related to huntington 's disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(disease, be from africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(disease, start in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(allergy, be bad in chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in tennessee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(allergy, be bad in tennessee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(allergy, be bad in tennessee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in tennessee)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(allergy, be bad in kentucky)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(allergy, be in las vegas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in kentucky)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(allergy, be in las vegas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be in las vegas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(allergy, be in las vegas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(allergy, be bad in kentucky)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in kentucky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(disease, start in africa)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(disease, be from africa)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heart disease, be related to huntington 's disease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(disease, start in africa)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(disease, be from africa)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(allergy, be bad in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heart disease, be related to huntington 's disease)