alpaca: has quality noise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality noise 1.00
make noise 0.93
is noisy 0.78
has quality good 0.77
has quality cost 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sheep, make noise)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sheep, make noise)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sheep, make noise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(alpaca, make noise)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(alpaca, make noise)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(alpaca, make noise)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, make noise)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(alpaca, is noisy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(alpaca, is noisy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(alpaca, is noisy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is noisy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality cost)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sheep, make noise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(alpaca, has quality noise)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)