alpaca: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(alpaca, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(alpaca, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(alpaca, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)