alpaca: has state names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state names 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has state names)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(prairie dog, has state names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, has state names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(alpaca, has state names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has state names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(alpaca, has state names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has state names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has state names)